Myanmar Newsflash | 06. April 2020
Having emerged as a public health threat, Covid-19 increasingly poses a threat to business operations as well. The numerous precautionary measures taken by many countries around the world will hopefully help to contain the spread of the virus. Unfortunately, as a side effect, the measures are also increasingly restricting the free movement of people and goods. This has a growing impact on work processes, supply chains and, not the least, compliance with contractual obligations. Recently, we received several enquiries from clients on how to deal with these effects of the coronavirus in a legally compliant manner.
Following the first confirmed cases of patients with Covid-19 in Myanmar and recently announced protective measures and restrictions which inevitably disrupt businesses, transportation, procurement and supply chains, companies are expecting to experience delays and/or disruptions in the performance of contracts. Can companies use the current pandemic to claim relief under force majeure clauses?
The term “force majeure” originated from the French civil law system. Traditionally, such an event must be unforeseeable, insurmountable and external. In common law countries, there is no general legal concept of force majeure; rather, force majeure is a creature of contract. Common law jurisdictions usually interpret a force majeure event as an exceptional circumstance, which prevents one or both parties from fulfilling their obligations under a specific contract.
The first step to consider would be to check whether the contract provides a force majeure clause and provisions regarding business continuity and disaster recovery obligations.
While most contracts usually contain some form of force majeure clause, independent of the governing law of the specific contract, the scope of the circumstances included in the definition of force majeure and the consequences of the force majeure may differ from contract to contract.
On 11 March 2020, the World Health Organization officially qualified Covid-19 as a pandemic. Many contractual force majeure clauses explicitly include an epidemic or pandemic in their definition, in which case the official qualification leaves little room to interpretation. However, even if the contractual definition of force majeure does not expressly mention a pandemic, some consequences of Covid-19, such as raw material supply shortages and government lock-downs, would customarily constitute a force majeure event.
While every contract must be reviewed individually, a common consequence of force majeure would be, that the contract can be suspended or its performance delayed or reduced until the force majeure event comes to an end, without such delay of the performance of the contractual duties constituting a breach of the contract.
Contracts may however also provide for termination rights in the event of a (continuing) force majeure.
4. What to look out for in a force majeure clause?
In order to establish whether a party may claim relief under a force majeure clause, the following questions need to be considered:
In general, a force majeure clause can be implemented upon or within a certain time from the occurrence of the force majeure event. A written notice should be sent to the cocontractor to indicate that due to the force majeure event, the contract performance will be interrupted/suspended or the performance of the contract reduced until the force majeure event comes to an end.
Some clauses may also provide for the possibility to terminate the contract after a certain period of time, if the force majeure event is still occurring (e.g. six (6) months).
If the contract in question does not provide a force majeure clause or the scope of the clause does not cover the specific reason for delay or non-performance, the affected party may still be able to rely on general principles of law. While in some legal systems, there might be the option to rely on a general legal doctrine of force majeure, in most jurisdictions, another doctrine worth considering would be the concept of “frustration of contract”. In Myanmar, the frustration of contract is governed by sec. 56 of the Myanmar Contract Act (1872).
Generally speaking, frustration occurs when, without the default of either party, a contractual obligation has become physically or commercially incapable of being performed because the circumstances in which the performance is called for would render it radically different from that which was undertaken by the contract. The threshold for the contract to be considered to be frustrated is usually very high. Not every event which prevents the performance of a contract will constitute frustration. The event must be fundamentally different from one originally contemplated by the parties.
Pursuant to sec. 56 of the Myanmar Contract Act (1872), in the event that “a contract to do an act which, after the contract is made, becomes impossible, or, by reason of some event which the promissor could not prevent, unlawful, becomes void when the act becomes impossible or unlawful.“ Therefore, the contract is automatically discharged, meaning neither party has to comply with future obligations.
If the parties wish to enter into a new contract, specific attention should be given to referencing the Covid-19 pandemic. Indeed, the evolution of the pandemic is now not unforeseeable nor unpredictable and could likely not be claimed in good faith as a force majeure event, given that the parties would be aware of the pandemic at the time of signing of the contract.
For more information on this and other related issues, please do not hesitate to contact us. Our team of international and locally qualified lawyers will be happy to assist.